Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 5 Overview of key results from simulated flexible and non-flexible bioenergy power generation in the case study

From: Impact of flexible bioenergy provision on residual load fluctuation: a case study for the TransnetBW transmission system in 2022

 

Year 2022

NO-BE

NON-Flex-BE

Flex-BE

Renewable share (REN share)

26.8% (other renewables)

34.9% (other renewables + non-flexible bioenergy)

35.0% (other renewables + flexible bioenergy)

Variance in daily residual load

100%

70% (reduced by 30%a)

Maximum positive RL (deficit power)

10,440 MW

9801 MW (100%)

9458 MW (reduced by 4%a)

Minimum negative RL (excess power)

- 1965 MW

- 2604 MW (100%)

- 2362 MW (reduced by 11%a)

Hours of negative RL

42 h/a

98 h/a

70 h/a

BE power production in times of negative RL

44.1 GWh/a

26.5 GWh/a (reduced by 40%)

Avoided BE power production in times of negative RL

17.6 GWh/a

  1. aPercentages compared to “non-flexible” values