Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of local weights of main criteria, sub-criteria and global weights of overall sub-criteria as analyzed in this study

From: Criteria prioritization for the sustainable development of second-generation bioethanol in Thailand using the Delphi-AHP technique

Main criteria

Local weights of main criteria (%)

Sub-criteria

Local weights of sub-criteria (%)

Global weights of sub-criteria (%)

Min. weights (%)

Max. weights (%)

Standard deviation (SD) (%)

Technical feasibility

24.9

Biomass availability and collectability

38.9

9.7

1.8

18.0

5.58

Ethanol productivity

31.6

7.9

1.7

17.2

5.83

Biomass logistics

29.5

7.3

1.7

18.6

6.29

Subtotal

100.0

    

Economic feasibility

32.7

Net present value

24.1

7.9

2.3

22.6

6.95

Final price per liter of ethanol

39.6

13.0

3.0

25.4

7.06

Added value of input materials

36.3

11.9

2.2

26.8

8.49

Subtotal

100.0

    

Social impacts

17.3

Job creation

24.8

4.3

1.3

11.9

3.32

Food security

34.5

6.0

1.2

12.6

3.86

Change in household income

40.7

7.1

3.2

12.6

3.51

Subtotal

100.0

    

Environmental impacts

25.1

Indirect land use change

24.4

6.1

1.9

15.9

5.01

Greenhouse gas balance

31.4

7.9

2.7

17.4

5.0

Net energy balance

44.2

11.1

1.7

17.9

5.74

Subtotal

100.0

    

Total

100.0

 

100.0