Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 5 Path coefficients

From: Adaptive capability and socioecological traps: a bioenergy case in communities of Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico

 

Path coefficient

Standard deviation

T statistics

p Values

f2

Compensatory alternatives (COMP)- > bioenergy capability (EOBIO)

−0.305

0.068

4.512

0.000

0.218

Compensatory alternatives (COMP)— > bioenergy costs (EDBIO)

−0.423

0.061

6.991

0.000

0.105

Compensatory alternatives (COMP)—> Benefits of bioenergy (RBIO)

0.430

0.066

6.468

0.000

0.205

Bioenergy costs (RBIO)—> bioenergy capability (EOBIO)

0.313

0.066

4.718

0.000

0.110

Bioenergy capability (EOBIO)— > benefits of bioenergy (RBIO)

−0.159

0.069

2.296

0.022

0.028

Back to article page

Energy, Sustainability and Society

ISSN: 2192-0567

Contact us